Law discussion help – must be in bluebook format

Need 300 word with 3 scholarly references.  See the following topic:

 

In reading the first 3 chapters of the textbook, you’ve had a chance to learn a lot about how and when contracts are created. However, for as much as you learned how and when contracts are created, you have not had to think much about a bigger question: why are contracts created? One legal scholar, Professor C. Scott Pryor, has endeavored to describe a biblical worldview approach to evaluating an important contract law doctrine you’ve just learned about, the doctrine of consideration as a basis for enforcing contracts.

The first section of his article, which you were assigned this week, discusses the “preliminary groundwork” necessary for answering 2 questions:

  1. What purpose does consideration serve?
  2. What are the proper limits on the doctrine of consideration?

Professor Pryor’s preliminary groundwork takes the form of 3 doctrines and 3 perspectives for answering those questions.

Each of the 3 perspectives suggests why promises should be enforced and some limits to when they should be enforced. Provide a summary of all 3 of the assigned portions of the Article’s perspectives. After your summary, choose 1 of those 3 perspectives and discuss why that perspective might provide an appropriate limit on the courts’ power to enforce some contracts. Last, at the end of your discussion, write a short hypothetical fact pattern that you have created where consideration exists between 2 parties, but the perspective you choose suggests that courts should not enforce the contract.

"We Offer Paper Writing Services on all Disciplines, Make an Order Now and we will be Glad to Help"