Cis 498 project deliverable 3: database and programming design

Need your ASSIGNMENT done? Use our paper writing service to score better and meet your deadline.


Order a Similar Paper HERE Order a Different Paper HERE

Points: 150

Project Deliverable 3: Database and Programming Design

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

Section 1: Design Document

1a. Create a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletelycreated a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.

Insufficiently created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.

Partiallycreated a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.

Satisfactorilycreated a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.

Thoroughlycreated a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.

1b. Explain and support the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.

Insufficiently explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.

Partiallyexplained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.

Satisfactorily explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.

Thoroughly explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.

1c. Create database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions then identify primary keys and foreign keys, and explain how referential integrity will be achieved.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Did not submit or incompletely identified primary keys and foreign keys. Did not submit or incompletely explained how referential integrity will be achieved.

Insufficiently created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Insufficiently identified primary keys and foreign keys. Insufficiently explained how referential integrity will be achieved.

Partially created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Partially identified primary keys and foreign keys, explained how referential integrity will be achieved.

Satisfactorilycreated database tables with appropriate field- naming conventions. Satisfactorily identified primary keys and foreign keys. Satisfactorilyexplained how referential integrity will be achieved.

Thoroughlycreated database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Thoroughly identified primary keys and foreign keys. Thoroughly explained how referential integrity will be achieved.

1d. Normalize the database tables to third normal form (3NF).

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).

Insufficiently normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).

Partially normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).

Satisfactorily normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).

Thoroughlynormalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).

1e. Create an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Insufficiently created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Partially created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Satisfactorily created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Thoroughly created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

1f. Explain your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.

Insufficiently explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.

Partially explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.

Satisfactorily explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.

Thoroughly explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.

1g. Create a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Insufficiently created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Partially created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Satisfactorily created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Thoroughly created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

1h. Explain your rationale behind the design of your DFD.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.

Insufficiently explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.

Partially explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.

Satisfactorily explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.

Thoroughly explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.

1i. Create at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.

Insufficiently created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.

Partially created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.

Satisfactorily created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.

Thoroughly created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.

1j. Create at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.

Weight: 5%

 

Did not submit or incompletely created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.

Insufficiently created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.

Partiallycreated at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.

Satisfactorily created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.

Thoroughly created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.

Section 2: Revised Gantt Chart / Project Plan

2. Update the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.

Insufficiently updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.

Partially updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.

Satisfactorily updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.

Thoroughly updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.

3. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present